Re: is this data corruption?

> hi,
>
> thanks for reading/thinking.
>
>> Sorry, but I do not see any "-" versions in the above.  Simple and
> minimum reproduction recipe would be useful for the list to help.
>
> the - versions are identical.  as i wrote, there are 2 - versions in
> addition.  i didn't want to make a pointlessly long email.
>
> it would be great if i could provide a reproduction recipe.  i don't
> know how i couold do that in this case.  for example, when i try to
> pare down the repo and make private things obscured, i run into the
> proble that when i do staging, things change around, thus erasing that
> particular bug.  and other stuff like my limited knowledge of git.
>
> i'm afraid i am stuck with hoping for other types of solutions like
> "i've seen this before" or "that's not possuble unless..."or something
> a priori like that.  but if you have an idea of how to create a
> minimal repro in less than a week, let me know.
>
>
> On 12/31/22, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> the problem that seems like data corruption is that a few lines appear
>>> twice as - and once as +.  but in the current version of the files,
>>> those lines exist only once.  here are the lines.  there are 2 -
>>> versions and one + version:
>>>
>>> +***************** REF bigpart is a partition
>>> +biglike and homelike are distracting nonsense i think except
>>> +to describe inferior filesets.  anomalous subset of home
>>> +might be called homelike or so.
>>
>> Sorry, but I do not see any "-" versions in the above.  Simple and
>> minimum reproduction recipe would be useful for the list to help.
>>
>> https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
>
> --
> The Kafka Pandemic
>
> A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy:
> https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
>