git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Poor performance of git describe in big repos

From
ABAlex Bennée <kernel-hacker@bennee.com>
Date
May 31, 2013, 08:14 UTC
Message-ID
<CAJ-05NOEuxOVy7LFp_XRa_08G-Mj0x7q+RiR=u71-iyfOXpHow@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20130530193046.GG17475@serenity.lan>
On 30 May 2013 20:30, John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:21:55PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
>> Alex Bennée <kernel-hacker@bennee.com> writes:
>>
>> > On 30 May 2013 16:33, Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
>> >> Alex Bennée <kernel-hacker@bennee.com> writes:
> <snip>
>> > Will it be loading the blob for every commit it traverses or just ones that hit
>> > a tag? Why does it need to load the blob at all? Surely the commit
>> > tree state doesn't
>> > need to be walked down?
>>
>> No, my theory is that you tagged *the blobs*.  Git supports this.

Wait is this the difference between annotated and non-annotated tags? I thought a non-annotated just acted like references to a particular tree state?

Show 9 quoted lines
>
> You can see if that is the case by doing something like this:
>
>     eval $(git for-each-ref --shell --format '
>         test $(git cat-file -t %(objectname)^{}) = commit ||
>         echo %(refname);')
>
> That will print out the name of any ref that doesn't point at a
> commit.

Hmm that didn't seem to work. But looking at the output by hand I certainly have a mix of tags that are commits vs tags:

09:08 ajb@sloy/x86_64 [work.git] >git for-each-ref | grep "refs/tags"
| grep "commit" | wc -l
1345
09:12 ajb@sloy/x86_64 [work.git] >git for-each-ref | grep "refs/tags"
| grep -v "commit" | wc -l
66

Unfortunately I can't just delete those tags as they do refer to known releases which we obviously care about. If I delete the tags on my local repo and test for a speed increase can I re-create them as annotated tag objects?

-- 
Alex, homepage: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/
Previous: John KeepingNext: Thomas Rast
Message 13 of 33 in “Poor performance of git describe in big repos”
  1. Alex BennéeMay 30, 2013
  2. Ramkumar RamachandraMay 30, 2013
  3. Alex BennéeMay 30, 2013
  4. Ramkumar RamachandraMay 30, 2013
  5. Alex BennéeMay 30, 2013
  6. Ramkumar RamachandraMay 30, 2013
  7. Thomas RastMay 30, 2013
  8. Alex BennéeMay 30, 2013
  9. Thomas RastMay 30, 2013
  10. Thomas RastMay 30, 2013
  11. Antoine PelisseMay 30, 2013
  12. John KeepingMay 30, 2013
  13. Alex BennéeMay 31, 2013
  14. Thomas RastMay 31, 2013
  15. Alex BennéeMay 31, 2013
  16. Thomas RastMay 31, 2013
  17. Alex BennéeMay 31, 2013
  18. Alex BennéeJun 3, 2013
  19. Junio C HamanoJun 3, 2013
  20. Junio C HamanoJun 3, 2013
  21. Thomas RastMay 31, 2013
  22. Jeff KingMay 31, 2013
  23. Alex BennéeJun 3, 2013
  24. Jeff KingJun 3, 2013
  25. John KeepingMay 31, 2013
  26. Alex BennéeMay 31, 2013
  27. John KeepingMay 31, 2013
  28. John KeepingMay 30, 2013
  29. Alex BennéeMay 30, 2013
  30. Duy NguyenMay 30, 2013
  31. Alex BennéeMay 30, 2013
  32. Duy NguyenMay 30, 2013
  33. Alex BennéeMay 30, 2013

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.