Re: Git Daemon Dummy: 301 Redirects for git:// to https://
- From
Jason A. Donenfeld <jason@zx2c4.com>
- Date
- Feb 23, 2016, 15:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAHmME9pVuo+Wub3=DuY-4Zy0Gjm1qM6empt3vvx9JcarF-rbcA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160223061517.GA3252@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > Yeah, the existence of HTTPS (and the fact that the same URL can be both > anonymous and authenticated) is nice. Unfortunately, git-over-https is > not as efficient as the other protocols, because it's not asynchronously > bi-directional. It would probably be relatively simple to make a > "gits://" protocol, but I think it would be more interesting still if we > could do git-over-websockets, to get the ubiquity benefits of HTTP.
That's interesting. I didn't realize that even the smart protocol was not as efficient as HTTP, but that makes sense. git+ws:// would indeed be quite nice!
> Darn printed books. I thought the Ministry of Truth was supposed to take > care of keeping our facts up to date.
:-P