Re: "Problems" with git format-patch --thread email header ordering
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Mar 15, 2019, 16:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAHk-=whe+R7fkTi0eBnhrBY=_k_du3e5dkNsVe=HgKXLoXekdg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqk1h09224.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:47 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes: > > > While it's true that header ordering isn't specified, there's a common > > "canonical" order that the headers are listed in. To quote rfc822: > > ... > > body must occur AFTER the headers. It is recommended > > that, if present, headers be sent in the order "Return- > > Path", "Received", "Date", "From", "Subject", "Sender", > > "To", "cc", etc. > > I obviously won't do the last one myself, but if the issue is only > to swap from and date, then this may be sufficient, perhaps?
I'm not actually sure _what_ the order requirements for gmail are, since gmail itself doesn't seem to honor them. Does the order of the Message-ID header line matter, for example?
I don't think it's the order of the From/Date lines, actually, because google itself doesn't do that.
What Thomas Found out was that the exact same email with
Message-Id/From/Date/Subject/To
(in that order) does not work, but
Date/From/Subject/To/Message-Id
does work. Weird and "wonderful". But there might be a lot of other orderings that work or don't.
Having looked through some other emails, I know that
From/To/Subject/Date/Message-Id
Subject/To/References/From/Message-ID/Datealso works. Which makes me suspect that it's the Message-ID line that matters.
But it might be something _really_ odd, and maybe not just ordering at all (ie it might be something where gmail wants to see the "From" line, but only in certain circumstances, and only *then* does it matter if the From line comes before some other line or not.
All we know is
(a) gmail complains about the normal git format-patch ordering with a "no From line" bounce
(b) the same email with just headers re-ordered goes through
I *suspect* it's that Message-ID line, but .... It's very annoying.
Linus