Re: Show all branches and ahead/behind states
- From
- Robert Dailey <rcdailey.lists@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 15, 2015, 14:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAHd499Am4PFo-YRJEbQfPqtk571f4eNr_gkdy-3ATzyvBcc-jw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20150514223827.GB21149@peff.net>
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 01:13:15PM -0500, Robert Dailey wrote: > >> > git for-each-ref --format '%(HEAD) %(refname:short) %(upstream:short) %(upstream:track) %(subject)' refs/heads >> >> Great idea. For some reason I can't apply coloring though: >> >> for-each-ref --format '%(HEAD) %(refname:short) %C(bold >> blue)%(upstream:track)%C(reset)' refs/heads >> >> Output: >> >> hotfix/4.2.3.1 %C(bold blue)[ahead 1, behind 1]%C(reset) > > It's spelled "%C(bold blue)" in the --pretty formats, but in > for-each-ref, it's "%(color:bold blue)". Unifying these is one of those > things that has been on the radar for a long time, but nobody has quite > gotten around to it. > > -Peff
Thanks Jeff! That definitely fixed it. I was not able to find a reference for this in the git docs, maybe I just overlooked it somewhere.
As a second query, is there a way to do column alignment? For example, I would like the ahead/behind status in one column, and the branch names left aligned in a 2nd column. I can't simply use tabs here since the length of column 1 may differ more greatly than a single tab character.
I imagine there is no built in way to do this, but just curious. I'd probably end up having to write some complicated script :-(
Thanks again you've been super helpful.