Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix date checking in case if time was not initialized.
- From
Mike Gorchak <mike.gorchak.qnx@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 25, 2013, 21:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAHXAxrO4c=s0pjNpXK171HUbQT06jm-VAxNNK1DAqZEZfz6OtA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7va9qsxjzk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Show 5 quoted lines
>> So is_date() always return negative result for the text string where >> date is placed before time like '2008-02-14 20:30:45'. > Yes, it returns this -1 on other platforms, but... >> It must fail on >> other platforms as well.
It also fails under Linux, but real problem is not here, it is just an unoptimal date parser.
> ... the input '2008-02-14 20:30:45' still parses fine for others > (including me). That is what is puzzling. > A shot in the dark: perhaps your time_t is unsigned?
Yeah, it was a headshot :) It really due to unsigned time_t. I will send two patches right now with fixes regarding unsigned time_t comparison.