git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] bisect: add support for bisecting bare repositories

From
Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Date
Aug 9, 2011, 23:12 UTC
Message-ID
<CAH3Anrr1eDuG9WNGb168ekMUnRcfEu4TPnGcSnh9TwLpvVMkBw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<7vty9qsdhp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 39 quoted lines
> Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> This extension to js/bisect-no-checkout adds support for bisecting bare repositories.
>>
>> It does this by relaxing the requirement that git bisect is invoked in a repository with a working tree and by defaulting to --no-checkout in the case of a bare repository.
>>
>> Two tests are included to demonstrate this behaviour.
>
> I'd wrap the long line myself but next time please be careful.
>
>> diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
>> index 4fb7d11..62125ec 100755
>> --- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
>> +++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
>> @@ -592,6 +592,37 @@ test_expect_success 'erroring out when using bad path parameters' '
>>       grep "bad path parameters" error.txt
>>  '
>>
>> +test_expect_success 'test bisection on bare repo - --no-checkout specified' '
>> +     git clone --bare . bare.nocheckout &&
>> +     (
>> +             cd bare.nocheckout &&
>> +             git bisect start --no-checkout &&
>> +             git bisect good $HASH1 &&
>> +             git bisect bad $HASH4 &&
>> +             git bisect run eval \
>> +                     "test \$(git rev-list BISECT_HEAD ^$HASH2 --max-count=1 | wc -l) = 0" \
>> +                     >../nocheckout.log &&
>> +             git bisect reset
>> +     ) &&
>> +     grep "$HASH3 is the first bad commit" nocheckout.log
>> +'
>
> git-bisect does not have any cd_to_toplevel so with a working tree you can
> run a bisection from a subdirectory, it seems. I wonder what would happen
> if you did "cd bare.nocheckout/objects" or something silly like that.
>
> Just wondering...
>
Well, nothing obviously breaks...
expecting success:
	git clone --bare . bare.silly &&
	(
		cd bare.silly/objects &&
		git bisect start &&
		git bisect good $HASH1 &&
		git bisect bad $HASH4 &&
		git bisect run eval \
			"test \$(git rev-list BISECT_HEAD ^$HASH2 --max-count=1 | wc -l) = 0" \
			>../../silly.log &&
		git bisect reset
	) &&
	grep "$HASH3 is the first bad commit" silly.log
Cloning into bare repository bare.silly...
done.
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 1 step)
[3de952f2416b6084f557ec417709eac740c6818c] Add <3: Another new day for
git> into <hello>.
3de952f2416b6084f557ec417709eac740c6818c is the first bad commit
Previous: Junio C Hamano
Message 3 of 3 in “bisect: add support for bisecting bare repositories”
  1. 1/1 bisect: add support for bisecting bare repositoriesJon Seymour, Aug 9, 2011
  2. Junio C HamanoAug 9, 2011
  3. Jon SeymourAug 9, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.