Re: Arguments to git hooks
- From
jaseem abid <jaseemabid@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 6, 2012, 21:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAH-tXsDe7Hsacz19egdeW2sDV3SoPkJpJLPAmk_pCoEiR3wvcQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120506211120.GC5725@moj>
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Marcus Karlsson <mk@acc.umu.se> wrote:
> There are many different reasons to use hooks. If everything that a hook > could potentially need was passed to it as an argument then a lot of > data would often end up unused. Better to supply as little as possible > and only do more work when it's actually needed.
That seems like a good reason not to pass all of the data, but isn't the file names the most primary thing somebody can ask for?
Show 5 quoted lines
>> Are you suggesting me to run some plumbing command, parse the result >> and get the required data ? Is there an easier way to get this done? > > I wouldn't go as deep as the plumbing, I think git status --porcelain > should work just fine, the output is fairly easy to parse.
I have always wondered why 'git status --porcelain' is giving a 'plumbing' style output. Any docs on this somewhere?
-- Jaseem Abid http://jaseemabid.github.com