Re: [Outreachy] Blog: Introducing myself as an intern working to convert unit test to use clar
- From
Seyi Chamber <kuforiji98@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 22, 2024, 13:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGedMtfDMj5P0T6x3soe3OUhRbpSw_-m1Vcm+rhDat1vvReK9w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Z2e-T0NZzrMwEvmd@pks.im>
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 at 08:23, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 11:37:23AM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I just published a new blog post on unit test scripts I've selected > > and prioritized for initial conversion to clar. I would love for you > > to check it out and share your opinion! > > > > Find the link here: > > https://seyi-kuforiji-902b48.gitlab.io/posts/week-2-prioritizing-test-scripts > > Thanks for the blog post! The initial selection looks reasonable to me. > I was wondering whether it would make sense to evict "t-reftable-tree.c" > out of the first batch and then handle all reftable-related tests in a > single patch series. But we've got 9 of those, some of which are quite > complex, so that patch series would become quite large overall. So I > guess it's sensible to distribute the conversion of the reftable tests > across different patch series. > > Patrick
I suppose I could still make that work if that's your recommendation. I could divide the reftable-related tests into two sets and then treat them together. What do you think?
Thanks Seyi