git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: pre-push hook does not get input on non-fast-forward pushes

From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date
Mar 28, 2016, 21:56 UTC
Message-ID
<CAGZ79kbua6zgS3wkd9UKASDknxostFcBb_EWsVQ2WNaGeKw=2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<xmqq1t6uxop7.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 46 quoted lines
> Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
>
>> I noticed that without an additional --force the pre-push hook does not
>> get any input on stdin if a push would result in non-fast-forward
>> uploads. This is not a problem per se (although I don't get the
>> rationale) but it is undocumented and the latter left me puzzled.
>>
>> (Please keep me in CC since I am not subscribed, thanks)
>
> Thanks (no need to say "please cc me", as that is the norm here).
>
> The pre-push hook is not the only thing that may prevent you from
> pushing a ref update.  As you noticed, non-fast-forward check may
> trigger and decide that a ref is not going to be pushed, and that
> may happen before we call the pre-push hook.
>
>     Information about what is to be pushed is provided on the hook's
>     standard input with lines of the form ...
>
> So when the pre-push is called, the refs that will not fast-forward
> may not be among the "what is to be pushed", hence not reported.
>
> We _could_ add something like this to the documentation, but we do
> not necessarily want to promise that the order of checks to stay
> "internal checks like non-ff check first before pre-push hook", so
> this update may not be an improvement.  The current text conveys
> enough information without making such a promise, but you need to
> read it carefully.
>
> So I dunno.
>
>  Documentation/githooks.txt | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/githooks.txt b/Documentation/githooks.txt
> index 9ef2469..605ba4d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/githooks.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/githooks.txt
> @@ -201,7 +201,9 @@ does not yet exist the `<remote SHA-1>` will be 40 `0`.  If a ref is to be
>  deleted, the `<local ref>` will be supplied as `(delete)` and the `<local
>  SHA-1>` will be 40 `0`.  If the local commit was specified by something other
>  than a name which could be expanded (such as `HEAD~`, or a SHA-1) it will be
> -supplied as it was originally given.
> +supplied as it was originally given.  A request to update remote ref that has
> +already been rejected for other reasons (e.g. failing to pass a fast-forward
> +test) does not appear in the input.
If we don't want to give promises, s/does not/ may not/ ?

Although that sounds like it is non-deterministic (some occur, some don't, maybe it depends on $random_reason)

Show 9 quoted lines
>
>  If this hook exits with a non-zero status, 'git push' will abort without
>  pushing anything.  Information about why the push is rejected may be sent
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Stefan Tauner
Message 3 of 4 in “pre-push hook does not get input on non-fast-forward pushes”
  1. Stefan TaunerMar 28, 2016
  2. Junio C HamanoMar 28, 2016
  3. Stefan BellerMar 28, 2016
  4. Stefan TaunerMar 28, 2016

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.