Re: [PATCH] Add more proposals to SoC 2017 ideas page. (lots of submodule stuff)

From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date: Jan 25, 2017, 22:11 UTC
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kb_g5Wq=Aeo1RH-iA5M-drU5Gm1LAJZuPZU7oe=xdHaOQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170125220632.whjnpvrnhve2h6f6@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 01:59:31PM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>>   This applies to the repo at https://github.com/git/git.github.io
>
> Thanks. I've applied and pushed, though I'll admit I didn't really read
> it carefully for content. A few of the ideas look like they would need
> to be aggregated to be big enough for a SoC project, but that can be
> fleshed out in future patches (i.e., I don't think we care enough about
> history to have people polish and re-roll what are essentially wiki
> edits).

Yeah, I wasn't sure if the ideas were meant to also contain microprojects so I wrote down everything that came to mind, that I do not intend to work on myself over the next couple month.

>
> If you (or anybody interested in working on this) would prefer direct
> push access to the git.github.io repo, I'm happy to set that up.

Yeah I wouldn't mind direct push access there, then I could fixup what I just sent you, e.g. adding myself as a possible mentor or re-shuffling these ideas. :)

Show 8 quoted lines

>
>>   If you're looking for a co-admin/mentors, I can help out.
>
> I may take you up on the co-admin thing. I think it's good to have a
> backup, just in case.
>
> Anything you put on the Ideas page, you should probably be willing to
> mentor. We definitely _don't_ want Ideas that don't have a mentor.

agreed.

> I think in general that each idea should have the possible mentors
> listed below it.

ok, I can make a patch for that; but pushing seems (slightly) easier than mailing a patch.

Thanks, Stefan