Re: [PATCH 1/2] run-command: Remove set_nonblocking
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Nov 6, 2015, 19:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kbNpwhOF2eveux+yXibrYx+_S6KjvqLV7yEfAe5Sdg4uA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <563BBBBC.7070807@kdbg.org>
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> However, I think that the infrastructure can be simplified even further > to a level that we do not need additional emulation on Windows. > > First let me say that I find it very questionable that the callbacks > receive a struct child_process.
ok, I try to clean that up as well. However I made this choice as we need to set the working dir as well as the environment variables. I guess these will go into an extra argument then
> Here is a prototype patch. Feel free to pick it up. It marks a process > whose EOF we have found by setting .err to -1. It's probably better to > extend the meaning of the in_use indicator for this purpose.
Thanks for the proposal, I'll take that and make in_use a tristate for now (an enum consisting of FREE, WORKING, WAIT_CLEANUP)
Thanks, Stefan