git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: git push failing when push.recurseSubmodules on-demand and git commit --amend was used in submodule.

From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date
Jan 31, 2017, 22:08 UTC
Message-ID
<CAGZ79kbCfKVDq+9Pr5LmOtT=+uB+u+EMQg1=FUNS2umCvtvHhg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<xmqqvasxwee1.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> writes:
>
>> there seems to be a problem with using 'git commit --amend' in
>> git submodules when using 'git push --recurse-submodules=on-demand'
>> in the parent.
>>
>> The latter fails, saying "The following submodule paths contain changes
>> that can not be found on any remote:" for such submodule, even though
>> the submodule is clean, pushed and reports 'Everything up-to-date'
>> when trying to push it.
>>
>> I believe that the reason has to be that the parent repository thinks
>> that the comment that was amended, but not pushed, must be on the remote
>> too, while the whole point of amend is that this commit is not pushed.
>
> I am not super familiar with the actualy implementation of the
> codepaths involved in this, so CC'ed the folks who can help you
> better.
>
> I suspect the submodule folks would say it is working as intended,
> if \
>
>  - you made a commit in the submodule;
>  - recorded the resulting commit in the superproject;
>  - you amended the commit in the submodule; and then
>  - you did "push, while pushing out in the submodule as needed" from
>    the superproject.
Yes, for the current state of affairs, this is it.
Show 12 quoted lines
>
> There are two commits in the submodule that are involved in the
> above scenario, and the first one before amending is needed by the
> other participants of the project in order for them to check out
> what you are trying to push in the superproject, because that is
> what the superproject's tree records.  You somehow need to make that
> commit available to them, but after you amended, the original commit
> may no longer be reachable from any branch in your submodule, so
> even if you (or the "on-demand" mechanism) pushed any and all
> branches out, that would not make the needed commit available to
> others.  If you push your top-level superproject out in such a
> situation, you would break others.

In the long term future, we may want to reject non-fastforward submodule updates. (Not sure if that is feasible)

Show 15 quoted lines
>
> I think you have two options.
>
>  1. If the amend was done to improve things in submodule but is not
>     quite ready, then get rid of that amended commit and restore the
>     branch in the submodule to the state before you amended, i.e.
>     the tip of the branch will become the same commit as the one
>     that is recorded in the superproject.  Then push the submodule
>     and the superproject out.  After that, move the submodule branch
>     to point at the amended commit (or record the amended commit as
>     a child of the commit you pushed out).
>
>  2. If the amend is good and ready to go, "git add" to update the
>     superproject to make that amended result the one that is needed
>     in the submodule.
yup.
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Carlo Wood
Message 3 of 6 in “git push failing when push.recurseSubmodules on-demand and git commit --amend was used in submodule.”
  1. Carlo WoodJan 29, 2017
  2. Junio C HamanoJan 30, 2017
  3. Stefan BellerJan 31, 2017
  4. Carlo WoodFeb 1, 2017
  5. Stefan BellerFeb 4, 2017
  6. Carlo WoodFeb 1, 2017

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.