Re: [PATCH 0/9] Resending sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip

From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date: Oct 18, 2018, 18:00 UTC
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kapFJh+4rubbD4oNtzfceFc6yMWEixDu48vN7wqJGWMRw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa7nb67a2.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:30 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 12 quoted lines

>
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
>
> > This is based on ao/submodule-wo-gitmodules-checked-out.
> >
> > This resends origin/sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip, resolving
> > the issues pointed out via origin/xxx/sb-submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip-in-pu
> > by basing this series on origin/ao/submodule-wo-gitmodules-checked-out
>
> Applying this round to the result of merging ao/submodule-* to
> 'master' requires this to work, it seems, as you've introduced a
> call to repo-init thing in the meantime with another topic.

Unfortunately, yes, sb/submodule-update-in-c had one such call.

> > This is based on ao/submodule-wo-gitmodules-checked-out.
> Thanks.  I had an impression that we were not entirely happy with
> the topic and are expecting a reroll, but let's hope that the part
> we expect to be updated won't have much overlaps.

I slowly came to the realization that this topic might be ripped up into 2 or more topics, as some of the cleanups seem to be orthogonal.