Re: [PATCH 3/5] t/lib-submodule-update.sh: add new test for submodule internal change
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Dec 19, 2017, 22:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kZhiX8jqz-LxpeMp92caqU6urxS3T8gxoB4toDkGw0g6w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20171219223130.GF240141@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Hi, > > Stefan Beller wrote: > >> The test is marked as a failure as the fix comes in a later patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> >> --- >> t/lib-submodule-update.sh | 11 +++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > I think I'd find this easier to undrestand if it were squashed with the > patch that fixes it.
ok, let's squash this into the last patch then.
> This is part of test_submodule_foced_switch --- does that mean it > affects both checkout -f and reset --hard, or only the latter?
All of checkout -f reset --hard (and not reset --keep ;) read-tree -u --reset
Thanks, Stefan