Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] submodule: support reading .gitmodules when it's not in the working tree
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Sep 24, 2018, 21:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kZaomuE3p1puznM1x+hu-w4O+ZqeGUODBDj=-R3Z1hDzg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180924122031.9dbec6b4c2e2a8c1bff3365b@ao2.it>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:20 AM Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> > The third call, however, looks at the nested submodule at > > 'submodule/sub', which doesn't contain a '.gitmodules' file. So this > > function goes on with the second condition and calls > > get_oid(GITMODULES_INDEX, &oid), which then appears to find the blob > > in the _superproject's_ index. > > > > You are correct. > > This is a limitation of the object store in git, there is no equivalent > of get_oid() to get the oid from a specific repository and this affects > config_with_options too when the config source is a blob.
Not yet, as there is a big push to pass-through an object-store object or similar recently and rely less on global variables. I am not sure I get to this code, though.
> This does not affect commands called via "git -C submodule_dir cmd" > because in that case the chdir happens before the_repository is set up, > for instance "git-submodule $SOMETHING --recursive" commands seem to > change the working directory before the recursion.
For this it may be worth looking into the option
--super-prefix=<path>
Currently for internal use only. Set a prefix which gives a
path from above a repository down to its root. One use is
to give submodules context about the superproject that
invoked it.the whole motion of moving to in-process deprecates this clunky API to pass around strings to subprocesses.
Show 5 quoted lines
> The test suite passes even after removing repo_read_gitmodules() > entirely from builtin/grep.c, but I am still not confident that I get > all the implication of why that call was originally added in commit > f9ee2fcdfa (grep: recurse in-process using 'struct repository', > 2017-08-02).
If you checkout that commit and remove the call to repo_read_gitmodules and then call git-grep in a superproject with nested submodules, you get a segfault.
On master (and deleting out that line) you do not get the segfault, I think praise goes to ff6f1f564c4 (submodule-config: lazy-load a repository's .gitmodules file, 2017-08-03) which happened shortly after f9ee2fcdfa.
It showcased that it worked by converting ls-files, but left out grep.
So I think based on ff6f1f564c4 it is safe to remove all calls to repo_read_gitmodules.
> Anyways, even if we removed the call we would prevent the problem from > happening in the test suite, but not in the real world, in case non-leaf > submodules without .gitmodules in their working tree.
Quite frankly I think grep was just overlooked in review of https://public-inbox.org/git/20170803182000.179328-14-bmwill@google.com/
Stefan