Re: [PATCH/WIP v3 01/31] wrapper: implement xopen()
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Jun 24, 2015, 16:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kYtF+rHozVQhNz8uguLZvArPiB2UdkPTFn=Vc+YCsA=UQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <ed4f6565ed610a337244e06cc15b41bb@www.dscho.org>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 59 quoted lines
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 2015-06-18 13:25, Paul Tan wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/git-compat-util.h b/git-compat-util.h
>> index 0cc7ae8..bc77d77 100644
>> --- a/git-compat-util.h
>> +++ b/git-compat-util.h
>> @@ -719,6 +719,7 @@ extern void *xrealloc(void *ptr, size_t size);
>> extern void *xcalloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size);
>> extern void *xmmap(void *start, size_t length, int prot, int flags,
>> int fd, off_t offset);
>> extern void *xmmap_gently(void *start, size_t length, int prot, int
>> flags, int fd, off_t offset);
>> +extern int xopen(const char *path, int flags, ...);
>
> I wonder whether it is worth it to make this a varargs function. It is not too much to ask callers to specify a specific mode everytime they call `xopen()`, no?
>
>> diff --git a/wrapper.c b/wrapper.c
>> index c1a663f..82658b3 100644
>> --- a/wrapper.c
>> +++ b/wrapper.c
>> @@ -189,6 +189,31 @@ void *xcalloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size)
>> # endif
>> #endif
>>
>> +/**
>> + * xopen() is the same as open(), but it die()s if the open() fails.
>> + */
>> +int xopen(const char *path, int oflag, ...)
>> +{
>> + mode_t mode = 0;
>> + va_list ap;
>> +
>> + va_start(ap, oflag);
>> + if (oflag & O_CREAT)
>> + mode = va_arg(ap, mode_t);
>> + va_end(ap);
>> +
>> + assert(path);
>> +
>> + for (;;) {
>> + int fd = open(path, oflag, mode);
>> + if (fd >= 0)
>> + return fd;
>> + if (errno == EINTR)
>> + continue;
>> + die_errno(_("could not open '%s'"), path);
>
> It is often helpful to know whether a path was opened for reading or writing, so maybe we should have something like
>
> if (oflag & O_WRITE)
> die_errno(_("could not open '%s' for writing"), path);
> else if (oflag & O_READ)
> die_errno(_("could not open '%s' for reading"), path);
> else
> die_errno(_("could not open '%s'"), path);
>
> ? I know it is a bit of duplication, but I fear we cannot get around that without breaking i18n support.This distinction was part of earlier series, but Torsten Boegershausen suggested to leave it out. [compare http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/270048/focus=270049]
Show 5 quoted lines
> > Ciao, > Dscho > >