Re: Feature request: status could list ref names after "HEAD detached"

>
> M Hickford <mirth.hickford@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I frequently run `git status`. Sometimes HEAD is detached:
> >
> >     HEAD detached at ea601b57e
> >
> > It would be neat to include ref names here, similar to git log:
> >
> >     HEAD detached at ea601b57e (origin/main, origin/HEAD, main)
> >
> > This gives me more information before I create a new branch or switch branch.
>
> This has already moved away from the original "I want to know on
> which branch other worktrees are working" feature, but while we are
> expanding the edges...
>
> I wonder what you want to see when a detached HEAD deviated from its
> initial position (i.e., when we say "HEAD detached from", not "HEAD
> detached at", in "git status" output).  Would we still want to show
> the "--decorate" list of existing refs for the original position?
>
>     $ git checkout --detach master
>     $ git status | head -n1
>     HEAD detached at 3bd955d269
>     $ git checkout --allow-empty -m empty
>     $ git status | head -n1
>     HEAD detached from 3bd955d269
>     $ git reset --hard HEAD^
>     $ git status | head -n1
>     HEAD detached at 3bd955d269
>
> If we add "(master)" after 3bd955d269 in the above illustration, I
> wonder if it makes it too misleading.