Re: [PATCH v2] parse-remote: Remove reference to unused op_prep
- From
Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 4, 2017, 11:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAFZEwPPyJBD0a+Jkr7EBCurFzvHLvZY9r_SFWS2wyW7QmmP4pg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1486195204-26901-1-git-send-email-kannan.siddharth12@gmail.com>
Hey SIddharth,
> Subject: parse-remote: Remove reference to unused op_prep
^
Minor nit: after the colon, we generally don't use the word starting with an uppercase letter which I think can be figured out when you run `git log -p git-parse-remote.sh`
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Siddharth Kannan <kannan.siddharth12@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 29 quoted lines
> The error_on_missing_default_upstream helper function learned to
> take op_prep argument with 15a147e618 ("rebase: use @{upstream}
> if no upstream specified", 2011-02-09), but as of 045fac5845
> ("i18n: git-parse-remote.sh: mark strings for translation",
> 2016-04-19), the argument is no longer used. Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Kannan <kannan.siddharth12@gmail.com>
> ---
> Thanks a lot, Pranit and Junio for your reviews on the first version of this
> patch. I have changed the messages accordingly.
>
> contrib/examples/git-pull.sh | 2 +-
> git-parse-remote.sh | 3 +--
> git-rebase.sh | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/contrib/examples/git-pull.sh b/contrib/examples/git-pull.sh
> index 6b3a03f..1d51dc3 100755
> --- a/contrib/examples/git-pull.sh
> +++ b/contrib/examples/git-pull.sh
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ error_on_no_merge_candidates () {
> echo "for your current branch, you must specify a branch on the command line."
> elif [ -z "$curr_branch" -o -z "$upstream" ]; then
> . git-parse-remote
> - error_on_missing_default_upstream "pull" $op_type $op_prep \
> + error_on_missing_default_upstream "pull" $op_type \
> "git pull <remote> <branch>"
> else
> echo "Your configuration specifies to $op_type $op_prep the ref '${upstream#refs/heads/}'"I guess I suggested you to not change the file in contrib/ in my earlier email[1] and to which Junio agreed too[2]. Is there any confusion?
Show 30 quoted lines
> diff --git a/git-parse-remote.sh b/git-parse-remote.sh
> index d3c3998..9698a05 100644
> --- a/git-parse-remote.sh
> +++ b/git-parse-remote.sh
> @@ -56,8 +56,7 @@ get_remote_merge_branch () {
> error_on_missing_default_upstream () {
> cmd="$1"
> op_type="$2"
> - op_prep="$3" # FIXME: op_prep is no longer used
> - example="$4"
> + example="$3"
> branch_name=$(git symbolic-ref -q HEAD)
> display_branch_name="${branch_name#refs/heads/}"
> # If there's only one remote, use that in the suggestion
> diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh
> index 04f6e44..b89f960 100755
> --- a/git-rebase.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase.sh
> @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ then
> then
> . git-parse-remote
> error_on_missing_default_upstream "rebase" "rebase" \
> - "against" "git rebase $(gettext '<branch>')"
> + "git rebase $(gettext '<branch>')"
> fi
>
> test "$fork_point" = auto && fork_point=t
> --
> 2.1.4
>[1]: http://public-inbox.org/git/CAFZEwPMGTzVuLMSzm8wiNxvia4AV0T79C1ZTfcuO4=Bydz_zQA@mail.gmail.com/ [2]: http://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqd1ey8rul.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com/