Re: git-scm.com status report

From: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 5, 2017, 20:11 UTC
Message-ID: <CAFZEwPPX4LngKrOHxgEp4aMGKOs0w4LHUBKumtmeRJSZ2_iV_Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170202023349.7fopb3a6pc6dkcmd@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Hey Peff,

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:

Show 5 quoted lines

> ## What's on the site
>
> We have the domains git-scm.com and git-scm.org (the latter we've had
> for a while). They both point to the same website, which has general
> information about Git, including:

Since we have an "official" control over the website, shouldn't we be using the .org domain more because we are more of an organization? What I mean is that in many places, we have referred to git-scm.com, which was perfectly fine because it was done by github which is a company but now I think it would be more appropriate to use git-scm.org domain. We can forward all .com requests to .org and try to move all reference we know about, to .org. What do you all think?

Regards, Pranit Bauva