Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] for-each-repo: new command used for multi-repo operations
- From
- Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 28, 2013, 17:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAFXTnz6zN0izx8S23JFww5niVD6x-r2e7TSthqZnempUrvAEWw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130128081006.GA2434@elie.Belkin>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> > Lars Hjemli wrote: > >> [1] The 'git -a' rewrite patch shows how I think about this command - >> it's just an option to the 'git' command, modifying the way any >> subcommand is invoked (btw: I don't expect that patch to be applied >> since 'git-all' was deemed to generic, so I'll just carry the patch in >> my own tree). > > As one data point, 'git all' also seems too generic to me but 'git -a' > doesn't. Intuition can be weird. > > So if I ran the world, then having commands > > git -a diff > > and > > git for-each-repo git diff > > do the same thing would be fine. Of course I don't run the world. ;-)
This would make me very happy. Junio?
-- larsh