Re: [PATCH 4/7] reftable: avoid writing empty keys at the block layer

From

Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>

Date

Jan 17, 2022, 13:10 UTC

Message-ID

<CAFQ2z_NLauUqf8FdWbQVxVmqx5xQ11E5t5SwDDyKyLSa9QU8KA@mail.gmail.com>

In-Reply-To

<xmqqpmovds5q.fsf@gitster.g>

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 2:26 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

> > +     ref.refname = "";
> > +     ref.value_type = REFTABLE_REF_DELETION;
> > +     n = block_writer_add(&bw, &rec);
> > +     EXPECT(n == REFTABLE_API_ERROR);
> > +
>
> The preimage of this hunk has been invalidated by your 9c498398
> (reftable: make reftable_record a tagged union, 2021-12-22).
>
> I see that the hn/reftable-coverity-fixes topic, which the commit is
> a part of, has been expecting a reroll since last year---are you

> plannning to rebuild that series after landing this series first?

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich
I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays.
--

Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado