Re: New orphan worktree?

From: Jim Hill <gjthill@gmail.com>
Date: Jan 6, 2021, 22:01 UTC
Message-ID: <CAEE75_0e4_m_7hQXycVK1f=4LOb82U2DYveAvcF2XKKNgmfpNw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq1rexrbz1.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:32 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

> a need to have multiple unrelated line of histories in a single
> repository may not be there, even though a desire to do so might
> exist.  What is done with these unrelated histories that record
> unrelated contents [*1*]?

Git itself is an example of other reasons for carrying disjoint dags as a set of related histories.

Also, I've taken to carrying submodule histories in the main repo, the setup is very easy, just a submodule init and worktree add. I think the pair of flows shows disjoint dags can be on a spectrum of relatedness.