Re: [PATCH] git-p4: Add failing test case for name-rev vs symbolic-ref
- From
Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
- Date
- Mar 27, 2017, 06:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAE5ih78jhR3GwMBdPyi5oOHByC2fVxefExStc9pCNMTu-1Os7w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqefxj4ofm.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On 27 March 2017 at 00:18, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org> writes: > >> As per the discussion about use of "git name-rev" vs "git symbolic-ref" in >> git-p4 here: >> >> http://marc.info/?l=git&m=148979063421355 >> >> git-p4 could get confused about the branch it is on and affects >> the git-p4.allowSubmit <branchname> option. This adds a failing >> test case for the problem. >> >> Luke Diamand (1): >> git-p4: add failing test for name-rev rather than symbolic-ref >> >> t/t9807-git-p4-submit.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > Ahh, thanks for tying loose ends. I completely forgot about that > topic. > > If we queue this and then update the function in git-p4.py that > (mis)uses name-rev to learn the current branch to use symbolic-ref > instead, can we flip the "expect_failure" to "expect_success"?
Yes. The test passes with your change.
> > IOW, can we have a follow up to this patch that fixes a known > breakage the patch documents ;-)?
Yes.
Regards! Luke