Re: [PATCH] git-p4: improve branch option handling
- From
Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
- Date
- Apr 20, 2017, 17:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAE5ih7-V6JzG8RZBoVDxGAOPuFt86r+UC1t5adKre29CFu8bOw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170420135232.16415-1-aoakley@roku.com>
On 20 April 2017 at 14:52, Andrew Oakley <aoakley@roku.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> It is sometimes useful (much quicker) to request commands only operate > on a single branch. > > The P4Sync command has been updated to handle self.branch being None for > consitency with the P4Submit.
Should that be consistency?
Show 89 quoted lines
>
> The P4Rebase command has been given a branch option which is forwarded
> to the P4Sync command it runs.
>
> The P4Submit command has been simplified to not call P4Sync itself, it
> lets P4Rebase do it instead (now that the branch can be handled). This
> fixes an issue where P4Submit does a sync of the requested branch and
> then does a rebase which does a sync of all branches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Oakley <aoakley@roku.com>
> ---
> Documentation/git-p4.txt | 4 ++++
> git-p4.py | 15 +++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-p4.txt b/Documentation/git-p4.txt
> index 7436c64..a03a291 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-p4.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-p4.txt
> @@ -328,6 +328,10 @@ Rebase options
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> These options can be used to modify 'git p4 rebase' behavior.
>
> +--branch <branch>::
> + Sync this named branch instead of the default p4/master. See the
> + "Sync options" section above for more information.
> +
> --import-labels::
> Import p4 labels.
>
> diff --git a/git-p4.py b/git-p4.py
> index 8d151da..e58b34a 100755
> --- a/git-p4.py
> +++ b/git-p4.py
> @@ -2161,13 +2161,9 @@ class P4Submit(Command, P4UserMap):
> elif len(commits) == len(applied):
> print ("All commits {0}!".format(shelved_applied))
>
> - sync = P4Sync()
> - if self.branch:
> - sync.branch = self.branch
> - sync.run([])
> -
> rebase = P4Rebase()
> - rebase.rebase()
> + rebase.branch = self.branch
> + rebase.run([])
>
> else:
> if len(applied) == 0:
> @@ -2343,7 +2339,7 @@ class P4Sync(Command, P4UserMap):
> self.silent = False
> self.createdBranches = set()
> self.committedChanges = set()
> - self.branch = ""
> + self.branch = None
> self.detectBranches = False
> self.detectLabels = False
> self.importLabels = False
> @@ -3281,7 +3277,7 @@ class P4Sync(Command, P4UserMap):
> system("git fetch origin")
>
> branch_arg_given = bool(self.branch)
> - if len(self.branch) == 0:
> + if not branch_arg_given:
> self.branch = self.refPrefix + "master"
> if gitBranchExists("refs/heads/p4") and self.importIntoRemotes:
> system("git update-ref %s refs/heads/p4" % self.branch)
> @@ -3567,14 +3563,17 @@ class P4Rebase(Command):
> def __init__(self):
> Command.__init__(self)
> self.options = [
> + optparse.make_option("--branch", dest="branch"),
> optparse.make_option("--import-labels", dest="importLabels", action="store_true"),
> ]
> + self.branch = None
> self.importLabels = False
> self.description = ("Fetches the latest revision from perforce and "
> + "rebases the current work (branch) against it")
>
> def run(self, args):
> sync = P4Sync()
> + sync.branch = self.branch
> sync.importLabels = self.importLabels
> sync.run([])
>
> --
> 2.10.2
>Apart from the typo above, this looks sensible to me. Would you be able to add a test case?
Thanks! Luke