Re: [PATCH 3/3] stash: require a clean index to apply
- From
bär <crashcookie@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 10, 2015, 21:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CADQvvWWS35vO9XZAEc6Zb3PPRU1XBOn_Xe+1P3-RVOcSFjbHKw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20150610192734.GA23715@peff.net>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I dunno. With respect to the original patch, I am OK if we just want to > revert it. This area of stash seems a bit under-designed IMHO, but if > people were happy enough with it before, I do not think the safety > benefit from ed178ef is that great (it is not saving you from destroying > working tree content, only the index state; the individual content blobs > are still available from git-fsck).
I feel the same way, in fact I'm +1 to revert it until we figure out a better way to deal with this properly.
-- Ber Clausen