Re: Coloring

From: Irving Rabin <irving@edmodo.com>
Date: May 31, 2017, 21:10 UTC
Message-ID: <CAD1ypiUDOtnKwctNQCHmxviPzkDPeP8FT_W2XEXrpHsfgC5Bhg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170531210448.6kolid5umzyasxnc@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Thanks Jeff, my problem has been resolved by Samuel Lijin. My terminal settings didn't set bold which remained white. I fixed it and my problem was gone! This issue is closed. Is there any way to retire it? Irving Rabin Software Developer @Edmodo 408-242-1299

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:

Show 58 quoted lines

> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:33:31AM -0700, Irving Rabin wrote:
>
>> Specifically, if the field is supposed to be white, it doesn't mean it
>> should be literally 0xFFFFFF. It should be the color that I have
>> configured as White color for my console emulator.
>>
>> I like light-screen terminals, and I configure my ANSI colors in the
>> way that they are clearly visible on the background and clearly
>> distinct between themselves. In my terminal settings background is
>> light-yellow, Black is black, Yellow is brown, Red is dark red,
>> Magenta is purple and White is dark gray. I set it once and I can use
>> it everywhere - all Unix commands work correctly, I can edit
>> highlighted source code in Vim, and all my color settings are
>> respected.
>
> Git outputs ANSI color codes, which are interpreted by your terminal.
> You _can_ configure Git to send 24-bit color codes if your terminal
> supports it, but by default it uses the traditional set of limited color
> and attribute codes.
>
> What does running the following snippet in your shell look like?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> while read name code; do
>         printf '\033[%sm%s\033[m\n' "$code" "$name"
> done <<-\EOF
> normal
> bold 1
> red 31
> green 32
> yellow 33
> blue 34
> magenta 35
> cyan 36
> bold-red 1;31
> bold-green 1;32
> bold-yellow 1;33
> bold-blue 1;34
> bold-magenta 1;35
> bold-cyan 1;36
> EOF
>
> -- 8< --
>
> If any of the colors are not what you expect, is there a pattern? E.g.,
> I wouldn't be surprised if "bold" shows up as bright white. In many
> modern terminal emulators, the bold variants need to be configured
> separately from the non-bold ones, and default to lighter variants of
> their non-bold counterparts. The solution there would be to check your
> terminal emulator config.
>
> If it does all look as you'd expect, try adding "| less -R" to the end of
> the "done <<-\EOF" line. Most of Git's output goes through that pager
> (though I _think_ it's mostly just passing through the ANSI codes, so it
> wouldn't have any effect).
>
> -Peff