Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] repo_config_values: migrate more globals

>
> Hi Olamide,
>
> On 3/10/26 20:06, Olamide Caleb Bello wrote:
> >       int status = Z_OK;
> >       int write_object = (flags & INDEX_WRITE_OBJECT);
> >       off_t offset = 0;
> > +     struct repo_config_values *cfg = repo_config_values(the_repository);
> >
> > -     git_deflate_init(&s, pack_compression_level);
> > +     git_deflate_init(&s, cfg->pack_compression_level);
> >
> >       hdrlen = encode_in_pack_object_header(obuf, sizeof(obuf), OBJ_BLOB, size);
> >       s.next_out = obuf + hdrlen;
>
> I didn't look closely at the other parts, but I have a small question
> about this section.
>
> pack_compression_level before this patch is a global variable:
>
>         int pack_compression_level = Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION;
>
> and struct option  in cmd_pack_objects contains its pointer:
>
> struct option pack_objects_options[] = {
>         ...
>         OPT_INTEGER(0, "compression", &pack_compression_level, ...),
>         ...
> };
>
> The reason why functions such as do_compress, write_large_blob_data can
> work properly is beacuse they all read the same global variable, right?
>
>
> However, in this patch,
>
> > +     struct repo_config_values *cfg = repo_config_values(the_repository);
> > +     int pack_compression_level = cfg->pack_compression_level;
>
> Here, a local variable with the same name was created via value
> assignment (I also find the naming a bit odd).
>
> > @@ -383,8 +383,9 @@ static unsigned long do_compress(void **pptr, unsigned long size)
> >       git_zstream stream;
> >       void *in, *out;
> >       unsigned long maxsize;
> > +     struct repo_config_values *cfg = repo_config_values(the_repository);
> >
> > -     git_deflate_init(&stream, pack_compression_level);
> > +     git_deflate_init(&stream, cfg->pack_compression_level);
> >       maxsize = git_deflate_bound(&stream, size);
>
> But then in the do_compress() function, the variable being read is still
> that pointer, cfg->pack_compression_level. The expected input wasn't
> *written back* to this pointer, right? If I understand correctly, after
> parsing CLI, the output is written to the local variable rather than the
> cfg. And that's why the naming is a bit confusing to me.
>
> struct option pack_objects_options[] = {
>         ...
>         OPT_INTEGER(0, "compression", &cfg->pack_compression_level, ...),
>         ...
> };
>
> I think change like this is needed. Of course, you'll need to
> double-check it. _(:3 」∠ )_
>
> Regards,
>
> Yuchen