git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date
Apr 8, 2019, 01:23 UTC
Message-ID
<CACsJy8DxW7ZcSNQBZq4+A6c+9xZopg79sXfi6Na61Xgcoqd6ng@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<CAP8UFD0qeOaS8NBOaMjzDf_tWJrgkYSAOgn8D=4JER2atg3H8g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:52 AM Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 25 quoted lines
> > Git has a very optimized mechanism to compactly store
> > objects (blobs, trees, commits, etc.) in packfiles[2]. These files are
> > created by[3]:
> >
> > 1. listing objects;
> > 2. sorting the list with some good heuristics;
> > 3. traversing the list with a sliding window to find similar objects in
> > the window, in order to do delta decomposing;
> > 4. compress the objects with zlib and write them to the packfile.
> >
> > What we are calling pack access code in this document, is the set of
> > functions responsible for retrieving the objects stored at the
> > packfiles. This process consists, roughly speaking, in three parts:
> >
> > 1. Locate and read the blob from packfile, using the index file;
> > 2. If the blob is a delta, locate and read the base object to apply the
> > delta on top of it;
> > 3. Once the full content is read, decompress it (using zlib inflate).
> >
> > Note: There is a delta cache for the second step so that if another
> > delta depends on the same base object, it is already in memory. This
> > cache is global; also, the sliding windows, are global per packfile.
>
> Yeah, but the sliding windows are used only when creating pack files,
> not when reading them, right?

These windows are actually for reading. We used to just mmap the whole pack file in the early days but that was impossible for 4+ GB packs on 32-bit platforms, which was one of the reasons, I think, that sliding windows were added, to map just the parts we want to read.

Show 9 quoted lines
> > # Points to work on
> >
> > * Investigate pack access call chains and look for non-thread-safe
> > operations on then.
> > * Protect packfile.c read-and-write global variables, such as
> > pack_open_windows, pack_open_fds and etc., using mutexes.
>
> Do you want to work on making both packfile reading and packfile
> writing thread safe? Or just packfile reading?

Packfile writing is probably already or pretty close to thread-safe (at least the main writing code path in git-pack-objects; the streaming blobs to a pack, i'm not so sure).

-- 
Duy
Previous: Christian CouderNext: Duy Nguyen
Message 3 of 13 in “[GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe”
  1. Matheus Tavares BernardinoApr 7, 2019
  2. Christian CouderApr 7, 2019
  3. Duy NguyenApr 8, 2019
  4. Duy NguyenApr 8, 2019
  5. Christian CouderApr 8, 2019
  6. Matheus Tavares BernardinoApr 8, 2019
  7. Matheus Tavares BernardinoApr 8, 2019
  8. Philip OakleyApr 8, 2019
  9. Matheus Tavares BernardinoApr 8, 2019
  10. Philip OakleyApr 8, 2019
  11. Matheus Tavares BernardinoApr 8, 2019
  12. Torsten BögershausenApr 9, 2019
  13. Matheus Tavares BernardinoApr 8, 2019

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.