Re: Another use of "@"?
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 4, 2013, 03:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8DsrY9ybLoCAo35Puc7oR41Kda9nKjBXL147qN-3xrMRA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqy5bvaf6x.fsf@grenoble-inp.fr>
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> The A/@ could make sense, but I'm wondering whether we're taking the
> direction of implementing some kind of Brainfuck dialect in Git revision
> specifiers. I'm not sure we want to add more special characters here and
> there with subtly different meanings (@ = HEAD, @{1} = HEAD@{1}, A/@ =
> A/$(git symbolic-ref --short HEAD)).Another subtle overloading of @ that might be desirable (althought might be achievable another way). "git log -g" is equal to "git log -g HEAD" but there is no easy way (that I know of) to do "git log -g $(git symbolic-ref HEAD)". "@" could fill the inconvenient spot here, I think. Alias is no good because I won't be able to add extra options. -- Duy