Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] ref-filter: add option to align atoms to the left
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 27, 2015, 10:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8Dr29B7Lei-jFqgPViZwd6BZcJde0jkcAwySYcY2v8QqA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CA+P7+xob8eUf=oJHYN3fBB3k+XX+Jj8Vy0fKLtVQUGdsWDyaKA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
>>> You can generate an interdiff with "git diff branchname-v4
>>> branchname-v5", for instance.
>>
>> Off topic. But what stops me from doing this often is it creates a big
>> mess in "git tag -l". Do we have an option to hide away some
>> "insignificant:" tags? reflog might be an option if we have something
>> like foo@{/v2} to quickly retrieve the reflog entry whose message
>> contains "v2".
>
> You can normally find the previous commit via the reflog. Various
> changes to the settings can make the reflog be maintained for longer
> if you have longer lived patch series. That's how I would suggest it,
> rather than branches, as I tend not to keep old versions around on
> separate tags or branches.
>
> The problem with "foo@{/v2}" is that people don't always keep values
> inside the message it self, but maybe "foo@{/pattern}" would be a
> useful extension?"reflog message" is different from "commit message". I was referring to the first one (which is out of user control), perhaps you were referring to the second one? I don't expect people to add v2 to manually. If we have something like foo@{/v2} then we can teach send-email (or format-patch) to add a reflog entry with "v2" in it. But maybe we're abusing reflog..
-- Duy