Re: [PATCH v2 14/14] commit.h: delete 'util' field in struct commit
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 14, 2018, 17:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8DhUw6L7j3Pkqji_K0WMjFZxs315emmvdyNQJJN4VTwgw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180514160738.GA19821@duynguyen.home>
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 33 quoted lines
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:52:29PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > diff --git a/commit.h b/commit.h
>> > index 838f6a6b26..70371e111e 100644
>> > --- a/commit.h
>> > +++ b/commit.h
>> > @@ -18,12 +18,16 @@ struct commit_list {
>> >
>> > struct commit {
>> > struct object object;
>> > - void *util;
>> > unsigned int index;
>> > timestamp_t date;
>> > struct commit_list *parents;
>> > struct tree *tree;
>> > uint32_t graph_pos;
>> > + /*
>> > + * Do not add more fields here unless it's _very_ often
>> > + * used. Use commit-slab to associate more data with a commit
>> > + * instead.
>> > + */
>> > };
>>
>> That's a logical consequence and a natural endgame of this
>> pleasent-to-read series. THanks.
>>
>> Unfortunately we are gaining more and more stuff in "struct commit"
>> with recent topics, and we may want to see if we can evict some of
>> them out to shrink it again.
>
> Sigh.. ds/lazy-load-trees already enters 'next' so a fixup patch is
> something like this.Sorry I take this patch back. I didn't realize it was a rename and the old field named 'tree' was already there (I vaguely recalled some "tree" in this struct but didn't stop to think about it). Moving graph_pos out is an option, but only 32-bit arch gains from it (64-bit arch will have 4 bytes padding anyway) so probably not worth the effort. "generation" field should probably be moved out though.
-- Duy