Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] nd/clone-detached
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 14, 2012, 04:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8DggQdM1aoeL+u=3Wz+5f7hi4eG=6MHXPCJZ6pOmhQJ_w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vvcofxtv8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
2012/1/14 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Thanks, replaced (and updated comment strings read much better). > > There were some conlicts I had to resolve while merging this to 'pu'. > I would appreciate it if you can eyeball it to make sure I didn't make > silly mistakes there.
Right, the conflict with nd/clone-single-branch. I kept thinking there would not be conflict because clone-single-branch's big change was in wanted_peer_refs() and missed write_followtags() call. The merge looks good.
-- Duy