Re: [PATCH] log: decorate HEAD -> branch with the same color for branch and HEAD

> Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 01.07.2016 08:31:
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 06:39:42PM +0200, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>>
>>> Commit 76c61fb (log: decorate HEAD with branch name under
>>> --decorate=full, too - 2015-05-13) adds "HEAD -> branch" decoration to
>>> show current branch vs detached HEAD. The sign of whether HEAD is
>>> detached or not is "->" (vs ", "). It's too subtle for my poor
>>> eyes. If color is used, we can make the branch name's color the same
>>> as HEAD to visually emphasize that it's the current branch.
>>
>> Hmm. I think I like this, as it uses color to make the grouping between
>> HEAD and its referent more clear.
>>
>> We do already use colors to indicate "type", though. Which means:
>>
>>   1. The branch now uses the "symref" color. Probably OK, as that is the
>>      point of the grouping (I wonder if the "->" in the middle should
>>      match in color, too).
>>
>>   2. We used to color based on current_and_HEAD->type, but now that
>>      information isn't conveyed. However, can this really ever have been
>>      anything _except_ a branch?
>>
>> -Peff
>>
>
> So, I rechecked, and I'm afraid I don't like the proposal.

>
> Currently, we have a clear color code that colors refs according their
> type (local branch, remote branch, tag, symref). This also corresponds
> to status colors, for example.
>
> Under the proposal, a checked out branch would not be colored like a
> local branch - note that back then, the result of the discussion was:
>
> - If a branch foo is checked out, do not decorate by "foo", but amend
> the HEAD decoration with "foo" and a symbol that denotes the connection.
>
> So, "HEAD -> foo" is an intentional union of two decorations.
>
> I wouldn't mind changing the color of "- > foo" if it were just an
> addition to "HEAD", but it is not - it's the decoration by the local
> branch foo.
>
> With git branch, we use "*" as a symbol for the checked out branch...
>
> Michael