Re: feature request: better support for typos
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 15, 2015, 09:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8DGUo0-zFm2xtAKE6wy0c2GdbiOe-X2+B0HnCNg3SKa8g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAN0XMOLDamBeWswDi0cn_naZ2TX+gd89+g48zNwPPKxTh+ZTww@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Hi, > > when a user made a typo, Git is not good in guessing what > the user could have meant, except for git commands. I think > this is an area with room for improvements. > Let's look into branches. When I "clone --branch" and make > a typo, Git could show me what branch I could have meant. It's > the same when I try to merge or track a branch.
Good candidate for those micro-projects next year.
> It might even > be possible to show suggestions for options for all Git commands.
You mean if you type "--brnch" it should suggest "--branch"? I was bugged about this and wanted to do something, only to realize in most cases git would show "git <cmd> -h", which does a much better job because it would explain what --branch is for as well.
> What I'm trying to say is, there are arguments with a limited > amount of possible values that Git know, so Git can show > suggestions when the user made a typo for such an argument.
-- Duy