Re: [PATCH v7 12/13] completion: let git provide the completable command list
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 13, 2018, 06:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8D+xes0+Lqyh+QEmTBuGm47nbbKQdcBRiCx-p5s7SoXnQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAM0VKjmL=OfKcveHRW+eAzvwS2o8TjcOS-uRNzD1JuKY2DYfFw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:05 PM, SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 32 quoted lines
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy > <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote: >> Instead of maintaining a separate list of command classification, >> which often could go out of date, let's centralize the information >> back in git. >> >> While the function in git-completion.bash implies "list porcelain >> commands", that's not exactly what it does. It gets all commands (aka >> --list-cmds=main,others) then exclude certain non-porcelain ones. We >> could almost recreate this list two lists list-mainporcelain and >> others. The non-porcelain-but-included-anyway is added by the third >> category list-complete. >> >> list-complete does not recreate exactly the command list before this >> patch though. The following commands are not part of neither >> list-mainporcelain nor list-complete and as a result no longer >> completes: >> >> - annotate obsolete, discouraged to use >> - difftool-helper not an end user command >> - filter-branch not often used >> - get-tar-commit-id not often used >> - imap-send not often used >> - interpreter-trailers not for interactive use >> - lost-found obsolete >> - p4 too short and probably not often used (*) >> - peek-remote deprecated >> - svn same category as p4 (*) >> - tar-tree obsolete >> - verify-commit not often used > > 'git name-rev' is plumbing as well.
So? name-rev remains completable like before and is not mentioned in the above list. Am I missing something?
Show 7 quoted lines
> I think this commit should be split into two: > > - first do the unequivocally beneficial thing and get rid of the > long, hard-coded command list in __git_list_porcelain_commands(), > while keeping its output unchanged, > > - then do the arguable thing and change the list of commands.
I will. Though the first commit still changes the output slightly because there are three commands not in command-list.txt. To keep the output unchanged, I would need to add them back in command-list.txt first (and find the right group for them) only to remove those lines later (two of them deprecated, the other does not even have a man page). It's not worth the effort.
Show 10 quoted lines
>> {
>> local i IFS=" "$'\n'
>> - for i in $(__git_commands)
>> + for i in $(__git_commands $1)
>> do
>> case $i in
>> *--*) : helper pattern;;
>
> Is this loop to exclude helper commands with doubledash in their name
> still necessary?It is needed for __git_list_all_commands() because that one still essentially grabs "git help -a", which includes command--helpers.
-- Duy