Re: [PATCH 2/2] fetch: silence git-gc if --quiet is given
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 15, 2014, 12:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8CuiAYGA-Tkr1p+KVm=hvpKYwooJMc9-z-pR4nOBDaTug@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140814195615.GB19337@peff.net>
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> I think this is a fine fix for this specific problem, and we should > apply it. But I do wonder if it would be simpler in the long run to > treat verbosity as a global option, and pass it around via a GIT_QUIET > (or GIT_VERBOSITY) environment variable. > > I would not be surprised at all to find that there are other cases where > sub-programs do not respect the parent verbosity (I know we have had > problems with progress reporting flags carried over the transport > interface in the past, but I think we fixed all of those).
I don't see any easy way to make everybody aware of $GIT_QUIET. But the idea is nice.
-- Duy