Re: Reducing git size by building libgit.so
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 12, 2019, 09:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8Ce9exNKEYojo8Uu6WjyjSGN2imO-8Z4cXa-FGkXs4GJQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87y32787k9.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
> I.e. we'd just have one git binary, everything else symlinking to that, > and we'd route to the right program by inspecting argv, which we mostly > do already.
If I remember correctly libcurl.so startup time was the reason it's split out of "git" binary, so we can't just merge everything into one (*). But yeah merging some back is not a bad idea.
(*) but maybe "git" binary has gotten much slower overall, or libcurl.so much faster that it does not matter anymore. That problem was like 10 years ago.
-- Duy