Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: convert to use parse_options()
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 1, 2012, 14:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8CZm96pVkavq_LvpX-MxdOtBw7XuwsQF61FJE8qk6ZZTg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v4nvb78om.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
I'm going to address your comments soon (thanks by the way, making up summary line for each option from git-pack-objects.txt was painful) but since you like thought-provoking, check this comment out:
/* Traditionally "pack-objects [options] base extra" failed; * we would however want to take refs parameter that would * have been given to upstream rev-list ourselves, which means * we somehow want to say what the base name is. So the * syntax would be: * * pack-objects [options] base <refs...> * * in other words, we would treat the first non-option as the * base_name and send everything else to the internal revision * walker. */
The last paragraph does not hold true anymore as far as I understand the code. IOW it drops everything in argv after base name. Looking back in history, the change was made by 8d1d8f8 (pack-objects: further work on internal rev-list logic. - 2006-09-06). Nothing is mentioned why it drops the remaining of argv. I suspect this is a regression and we should reinstate the behavior as the comment says.
-- Duy