Re: Index format v5
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 8, 2012, 14:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8CUC8AXYvDEH75NGC_r3HwLoaiq0qxn2EAC0Aq4VXVMag@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120508141137.GA3937@tgummerer.surfnet.iacbox>
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> * "160-bit object name for the object that would result from writing >> this span of index as a tree." Is this always valid? > > No, this is only valid if the entry count is not -1. It's clarified > now.
..and..
> The entry_count in the index is only valid, if the cache-tree is valid, > which is not always the case.
I think your trees are the cache-trees already. For invalid cache-trees, you can just use all-zero sha-1 as the indicator. Then entry_count can go away.
-- Duy