Re: [PATCH 2/3] Guard memory overwriting in resolve_ref's static buffer
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 11, 2011, 09:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8BRs2Xh5AgibyW=X41cSDVAzMDo3xXSjSpkm5wyKeYN=A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20111210211040.GB24817@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net>
2011/12/11 Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> - Rely on mmap/mprotect to catch illegal access. We need valgrind or >> some other memory tracking tool to reliably catch this in Michael's >> approach. > > I wonder if the lower-tech approach would be so bad in practice. On > systems using glibc, if MALLOC_PERTURB_ is set, then the value will > always be clobbered on free(). It would be possible to do the same > explicitly in resolve_ref() for platforms without such a feature.
Clobbered value may be carried around for some time before the code detects wrong value. It'd be hard to track back where the root cause is.
Show 6 quoted lines
>> - Because mprotect is used instead of munmap, we definitely leak >> memory. Hopefully callers will not put resolve_ref() in a >> loop that runs 1 million times. > > Have you measured the performance impact when GIT_DEBUG_MEMCHECK is not > set? (I don't expect major problems, but sometimes code surprises me.)
No. I wish we had a performance test suite. Which use cases should I test?
Show 5 quoted lines
> [...] >> Also introduce a new target, "make memcheck", that runs tests with this >> flag on. > > Neat. Did it catch any bugs?
No, otherwise I would have sent more patches ;)
Show 19 quoted lines
>> --- a/cache.h >> +++ b/cache.h >> @@ -865,7 +865,8 @@ extern int read_ref(const char *filename, unsigned char *sha1); >> * >> * errno is sometimes set on errors, but not always. >> */ >> -extern const char *resolve_ref(const char *ref, unsigned char *sha1, int reading, int *flag); >> +#define resolve_ref(ref, sha1, reading, flag) resolve_ref_real(ref, sha1, reading, flag, __FUNCTION__, __LINE__) > > __FUNCTION__ is nonstandard, though it's probably supported pretty > widely and we can do > > #ifndef __FUNCTION__ > #define __FUNCTION__ something-else > #endif > > in git-compat-util.h when we discover a platform that doesn't support > it if needed. __func__ was introduced in C99. __LINE__ and __FILE__ > should work everywhere.
Will change to __FILE__ then
Show 22 quoted lines
>> --- a/wrapper.c
>> +++ b/wrapper.c
>> @@ -60,6 +60,28 @@ void *xmallocz(size_t size)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +void *xmalloc_mmap(size_t size, const char *file, int line)
>> +{
>> + int *ret;
>> + size += sizeof(int*) * 3;
>> + ret = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>> + MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
>> + if (ret == (int*)-1)
>> + die_errno("unable to mmap %lu bytes anonymously",
>> + (unsigned long)size);
>> +
>> + ret[0] = (int)file;
>> + ret[1] = line;
>> + ret[2] = size;
>> + return ret + 3;
>
> Would this work on 64-bit platforms?No idea (I'm on 32-bit). I don't see any reasons why it would not work. But that function may cause unaligned access, I think.
> How does one retrieve the line and file number? I guess one is > expected to retrieve them from the core dump, but a few words of > advice in Documentation/technical would be helpful.
from coredump.
-- Duy