Re: [PATCH 4/4] gc --aggressive: three phase repacking
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 20, 2014, 01:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8AoyWbeUVjha7iiPPB8BA1k0L4ZQGs2WMb5yZwc0NZr2Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALbm-EbZSuzynXoUNEifP=Ga_mj6Fp9L9Do-mxhRdMvUEfogig@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Maybe we should introduce another option --pack-for-archive > which features the characteristics of the old --aggressive. > And the new --aggressive would be a tradeoff between space and > time? > Thinking further we could add a couple of options there like > --developer-friendly which makes blaming fast > --hosting-friendly which makes it most efficient when upstream > --archival-friendly (the old --aggressive) > --...
--aggressive-mode=<mode> would be a good option to select those friendly modes instead of a bunch of new options. Well, maby "gc --mode" is enough, we already have two modes: normal and aggressive (or although maybe it should be renamed archive).
-- Duy