Re: [PATCH 00/11] alternative unify appending of sob

> From: Brandon Casey <bcasey@nvidia.com>
>
> I hate to have the battle of the patches, but I kinda prefer the
> append_signoff code in sequencer.c over the code in log-tree.c as a
> foundation to build on.
>
> So, this series is similar to Duy's "unification" series, but it goes in the
> opposite direction and builds on top of sequencer.c and additionally adds the
> elements from my original series to treat the "(cherry picked from..." line
> added by 'cherry-pick -x' in the same way that other footer elements are
> treated (after addressing Junio's comments about rfc2822 continuation lines
> and duplicate s-o-b's).
>
> I've integrated Duy's series with a few minor tweaks.  I added a couple
> of additional tests to t4014 and corrected one of the tests which had
> incorrect behavior.  I think his sign-off's should still be valid, so I
> kept them in.  Sorry that I've been slow, and now the two of us are stepping
> on each other's toes, but Duy please take a look and let me know if there's
> anything you dislike.