Re: [git wiki PATCH 1/3] "Improving parallelism in various commands" project
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 2, 2012, 14:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8APtrw-6umkr3=yrG3wfye96=z=CvfWj0tnghfDcDWFzg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <57e8b4eb7a98af33982c2f3a763e18f62b1d6d6d.1330686331.git.trast@student.ethz.ch>
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> wrote:
> + * In preparation (the half-step): identify commands that could > + benefit from parallelism. `git grep --cached` and `git grep > + COMMIT` come to mind, but most likely also `git diff` and `git log > + -p`. You can probably find more.
I just had a thought this afternoon whether "git add" may benefit from parallelism. It's most likely I/O-bound, although I think if we add a bunch of large files, it might become CPU-bound. To generalize, anything that calls hash_sha1_file() might benefit from parallelism.
Another candidate may be git-apply. Actually I just want to speed up git-rebase and think git-apply may be the culprit. Or it could be unpack-trees code..
-- Duy