Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] git-submodule.txt: make subcommands underlined
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 13, 2019, 09:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8A2M2vc36OLN9jMt3tPq+AwNquyxjrdQXQ7zNZ8pAjTSQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190213081518.GA21926@archbookpro.localdomain>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:15 PM Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 01:56:11AM -0800, Denton Liu wrote: > > In git-remote.txt, the subcommands are underlined. Following that, we > > also underline the subcommands in git-submodule.txt. > > I'd like to retract this patch. I realised that between git-remote, > git-submodule, git-notes, git-stash, git-bisect, git-reflog, it's pretty > inconsistent between whether it's formatted with the underline or not. > > Also, I missed the underlining of the subcommands in the body of the > document. > > But if someone thinks that unifying the formatting is a worthwhile > pursuit, I'd be happy to reroll this patchset to include this fix.
Making documents look consistent is always good, I think. If you want to do this, maybe have a look at the "Writing Documentation" section in CodingGuidelines and add a note there too, about quoting subcommand names.
-- Duy