Re: [PATCH 1/1] Documentation: Correct man page for the SHAs reported by 'submodule status'

>
> "Manish Goregaokar via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
> writes:
>
> > From: Manish Goregaokar <manishsmail@gmail.com>
> >
> > 'git submodule status' reports the SHAs expected by the parent project,
> > not the SHAs that are actually checked out in the submodule. Checking
> > out a new SHA in a submodule will not change the output of 'git
> > submodule status' until you 'git add' the submodule.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manish Goregaokar <manishsmail@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/git-submodule.txt | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-submodule.txt b/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
> > index 0ed5c24dc1..31e089454a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/git-submodule.txt
> > @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ git-submodule will correctly locate the submodule using the relative
> >  URL in `.gitmodules`.
> >
> >  status [--cached] [--recursive] [--] [<path>...]::
> > -     Show the status of the submodules. This will print the SHA-1 of the
> > -     currently checked out commit for each submodule, along with the
> > +     Show the status of the submodules. This will print the SHA-1
> > +     recorded in the superproject for each submodule, along with the
> >       submodule path and the output of 'git describe' for the
>
> Am I mistaken to say that neither the old or the new description is
> correct, depending on the use (or non-use) of the --cached option?
>
>         ... print the object name of the commit that is currently
>         checked out, or the commit that is recorded in the
>         superproject if `--cached` option is given, for each
>         submodule, ...
>
> perhaps?