Re: [PATCH 02/12] t4150: am fails if index is dirty
- From
Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 7, 2015, 06:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACRoPnSTNxR4+NLX_f6FaOJPLj4k9ESaLrdwjfxhSZCZYHUOSw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <eb790f13314192dcf4787c54d4cd3cfb@www.dscho.org>
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On 2015-07-02 20:16, Paul Tan wrote: > >> diff --git a/t/t4150-am.sh b/t/t4150-am.sh >> index 3f54bdf..0a19136 100755 >> --- a/t/t4150-am.sh >> +++ b/t/t4150-am.sh >> @@ -154,6 +154,17 @@ test_expect_success 'am applies patch correctly' ' >> test "$(git rev-parse second^)" = "$(git rev-parse HEAD^)" >> ' >> >> +test_expect_success 'am fails if index is dirty' ' >> + test_when_finished "rm -fr dirtyfile" && > > Seeing as you `git add` that file further down, how about `git rm -f dirtfile` here?
But "git rm -f" would fail if the file is not in the index, no? (Which could happen if the git-reset or git-checkout fails) Anyway, the purpose of the "rm -f" is to remove the dirtyfile, and not to clean up the index (we would use git reset --hard for that).
(But yeah, I see that Junio noticed correctly that it should not be a rm -fr, but a rm -f instead.)
Thanks, Paul