Re: git with large files...
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 21, 2012, 14:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACPiFC+G4_3cZZW+wuKX47denO9D+g+C5MxG2i77yod3gtCWOA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAJDDKr5vZz_DepYKvdu34G60fmm8V_Sv8FU+J6O-DLoum07+jA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:47 PM, David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I'm not sure if it was the "big files" part that Randal was responding > to. IIUC it was the "using git for deployment" part. > > Packaging tools (Makefiles, .rpm, .deb, etc) are a better suited for > deploying software.
Fair enough. On that topic, I have to say that git, with suitable scripts controlling it, has been good to me for deployment to webservers (ie: synchronized deployment on server clusters). Limited to interpreted languages (py, php, etc).
I am not afraid of Makefiles, rpms or debs but sometimes they are a bit too much overhead.
cheers,
m
-- martin.langhoff@gmail.com martin@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff