Re: Centralized git
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 31, 2012, 14:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACBZZX7drB62ohpPOEs03SGe12sDmGzJDcGMboF50y9QLa6HbA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALZVapm-=HXdfb6LCrc60HgUJA0ptzb+E5r3Y1C2w_0eBo1onQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Javier Domingo <javierdo1@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Network, in this case is cheaper. The thing is that If I commit > frecuently, will have plenty of GBs of history, that nearly for sure I > won't use. I just need to have other people's work to merge. But I > want to think in Git style, I am pretty accustomed to that way of > doing things. That is why I sent this mail here. > > The idea is that if I modify 700MBs of video, with 20 commits I would > get in 21GB. And making a pull would be... just even more horrible > than anything. That is why I need to have also last checkouts filter. > Just download branch's HEADs.
You're obviously aware of git-annex, is there any reason you can't just use that?
That would give you what you want, you'd have a moving window of current files, and then you'd delete old files as they become un-needed.