Re: reftable [v3]: new ref storage format
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2017, 20:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACBZZX4RwAmdQFeLCNG4oYLrQjafw2g2PBy6-Jn_LLp4t6hXsA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAJo=hJvxWg2J-yRiCK3szux=eYM2ThjT0KWo-SFFOOc1RkxXzg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> 3rd iteration of the reftable storage format. > > You can read a rendered version of this here: > https://googlers.googlesource.com/sop/jgit/+/reftable/Documentation/technical/reftable.md > > Significant changes from v2: > - efficient lookup by SHA-1 for allow-tip-sha1-in-want. > - type 0x4 for FETCH_HEAD, MERGE_HEAD. > - file size up (27.7 M in v1, 34.4 M in v3)
I had some feedback on v2 here which still applies: https://public-inbox.org/git/87k234tti7.fsf@gmail.com/
It would be good to either get a reply to that, or if you don't think it's sensible for whatever reason and left it out of v3 have a "feedback received but discarded for <reason>" in these summaries as you're sending new versions.
Aside from the mail I sent I think that would be very useful in general if there's been any other such feedback (I honestly don't know if there has, I haven't been following this actively).